Man Starts Digging His Dream Home’s Foundation and Finds a Telecom Company’s Fiber Optic Cables Buried Illegally on His Property and Is Now Being Threatened With a $1,000,000 Lawsuit if He Touches Them
He bought a vacant residential lot, spent months working through the permit process, and finally got excavation started on the home he’d been planning to build. Two days into digging the foundation, the excavator hit something. Four feet underground, running directly through the center of the lot, exactly where the house was supposed to go, was a massive bundle of fiber optic cables belonging to a major national telecom provider.
He stopped construction immediately and called the utility marking service. They confirmed the lines. He spent hours on the phone with the telecom company before they sent an engineering representative out to look. The representative reviewed their records and acknowledged there was no recorded easement for his property. Ten years ago, when the lines were installed, someone decided to route them through the vacant parcel as a shortcut instead of running them along the roadway the way they were supposed to. Nobody recorded an easement. Nobody told the property owner at the time. And nobody flagged it when he bought the lot last year.
What the Company Did Instead of Apologizing
Rather than acknowledging the problem and working toward a solution, their legal department sent him a cease-and-desist letter. The cables serve more than 15,000 homes and businesses in the area, including a local hospital, and the letter made clear that if his construction activities disrupted service in any way, they would hold him personally liable for millions of dollars in damages.
They also told him the cables would need to be relocated to allow him to build, estimated the cost at over $100,000, and indicated they expected him to pay for it. He’s being asked to fund the relocation of infrastructure that was illegally placed on his property without his knowledge or consent, by a company that has now threatened to sue him for touching it.
What His Legal Position Actually Is
The absence of a recorded easement is the foundation of his case, and it’s a strong one. An easement is a legal right to use someone else’s property for a specific purpose. Without a recorded easement, the telecom company has no legal right to have those cables on his land. What they have is a trespass, and in most jurisdictions a property owner has the right to demand that a trespassing party remove whatever they’ve placed on the land at their own expense.
The cease-and-desist letter is a pressure tactic. It’s designed to make him feel financially exposed enough that he backs down, agrees to pay for the relocation, or allows them to quietly push through an easement after the fact at terms favorable to them. None of those outcomes are required, and an attorney who handles property rights or utility disputes will tell him the same thing.
The Adverse Easement Question
The telecom company may attempt to argue that ten years of continuous, open use of the property for their cables establishes some form of implied or prescriptive easement under Georgia law. Prescriptive easements, similar to adverse possession, can arise when someone uses another person’s property openly and continuously for a statutory period without the owner’s permission. Georgia’s prescriptive easement period is generally seven years.
That argument has real complications here. Cables buried four feet underground are not open and visible use in any meaningful sense. The property was vacant. There was no one present to observe the installation or object to it. And the company’s own records show they never attempted to formalize the arrangement through a recorded easement, which suggests they knew they were cutting corners when they laid the cable. Whether a Georgia court would find that buried utility lines on a vacant lot satisfy the requirements for a prescriptive easement is a genuine legal question, and one worth taking to an attorney before assuming the company’s position has merit.
What He Should Do Right Now
The first call is to a Georgia real estate attorney who handles property rights disputes or utility law. This is not a situation to navigate without legal representation, both because the stakes are significant and because the company’s legal department is already engaged. He needs someone in his corner who can respond to the cease-and-desist formally and put the company on notice that he knows his rights.
He should also pull his title insurance policy if he purchased one when he bought the lot. Title insurance is designed to protect buyers against exactly this kind of undisclosed encumbrance, and if the cables weren’t flagged during the title search, his insurer may have an obligation to defend his claim or compensate him for the impact on his property’s usability. That’s a separate avenue worth pursuing simultaneously.
Documenting everything from this point forward matters. Every communication with the telecom company, the engineering representative’s visit, the cease-and-desist letter, and the admission that no easement exists should be preserved carefully.
The Threat That Cuts Both Ways
The company’s warning about liability for disrupting service to 15,000 customers is real in one direction and a problem for them in another. Yes, cutting their cables would cause significant harm. It would also expose a major national telecom provider to significant legal and regulatory scrutiny for having infrastructure serving a hospital and thousands of customers sitting on private property with no legal right to be there. That’s not a comfortable position for them either, and it’s leverage he should understand he has.
A company that illegally buried cables a decade ago, admitted there’s no easement, and responded to discovery of the problem by threatening the property owner rather than offering to fix it is not operating from a position of strength. They’re operating from a position of hoping the threat lands hard enough that he goes away quietly. An attorney’s letter establishing his rights and demanding relocation at the company’s expense is the next move, not compliance with a cease-and-desist he has no legal obligation to honor.
Featured on Happy From Home:
