She Helped Her Closest Friends Buy the House Next Door and Now They’ve Put a Kiddie Pool Outside Her Home Office Window and Refused to Move It After Promising They Would
She and her husband have lived in their house for seven years, and about four years ago they helped their closest friends buy the house next door. Her husband and the couple grew up together, lived together in their twenties, and were in each other’s weddings. For a while having them next door felt like a natural extension of a friendship that had already spanned decades. Lately it’s felt like something else.
This article may contain affiliate links. See our disclosure policy for more info.
There’s always been a running joke that this couple operates in their own world, that everything tends to revolve around what works for them, but it’s stopped being funny. They have three kids and have started making decisions about shared spaces and boundaries based on what’s easier or more aesthetically pleasing for them, without asking and without seeming to consider how it lands on the other side of the property line.
The current issue is a kiddie pool. They own an acre of land with multiple spots that have water access. They chose to put the pool directly next to her house, positioned in front of her dining room window and directly below both her home office window and her bathroom window. She works from home and gives presentations from that office. They know this. Their explanation for the location is that they like to watch the sunset from there. Her husband asked them to move it because the noise from their two-year-old carries through the closed windows during her work calls and presentations. They said it wasn’t a problem and promised to move it. Three days later she watched them add more air to the pool and fill it with more water.
The promise that wasn’t kept
The moment they said it wasn’t a problem and agreed to move the pool, the situation became less about the pool and more about what happens when this couple makes a commitment to their closest friends and then doesn’t follow through. Inflating it further and adding water three days after promising to relocate it isn’t an oversight or a delay caused by being overwhelmed with a third baby on the way. It’s a signal about how seriously they take the agreement they made.
She’s been giving them the benefit of the doubt on the timing because the wife is due in a few weeks and the household is legitimately stressed. That’s a fair instinct. It also doesn’t change the fact that the response to a direct request from a close friend was to make the situation more permanent rather than less.
The acre problem that doesn’t have an answer
They own an entire acre. There are multiple locations on that property with water access where a kiddie pool could go and where children could watch a sunset. The sky is not exclusively visible from the strip of land directly beneath her home office window. The insistence on that specific location, in the face of a direct request from the people who have to work and live on the other side of it, is the part that doesn’t have a practical explanation grounded in necessity.
When someone has abundant options and chooses the one that’s most disruptive to the people around them after being asked not to, the choice stops being about the sunset.
What a second conversation needs to look like
The first conversation ended with a promise that wasn’t kept, which means a second conversation has to be more specific. Asking them to move the pool needs to come with a timeline and a clear statement of what she and her husband will do if the timeline passes without action. That doesn’t have to be a threat or a confrontation. It can be a direct and honest statement between people who have known each other for decades that the current situation isn’t working and that the vague agreement from three days ago needs to become something more concrete.
She’s already noticed that this couple tends to be surprised when she and her husband push back, as though opposition itself is unexpected. That dynamic is useful information going into a follow-up conversation, because it suggests that being clear and direct is more effective than being patient and assuming good faith will carry the day.
What this summer looks like if nothing changes
She already knows the answer to this. If the pool stays where it is, their entire family will be outside her office window all summer. She’ll spend months either working through the noise or avoiding her own office, and every time she looks out the window she’ll be looking at a situation that persists because a promise was made and ignored. The friendship will absorb that differently than a disagreement that got resolved, and she seems to already sense that.
The pool is entirely on their property and she can’t make them move it. What she can do is have a second conversation that makes clear this isn’t resolved and that the promise they made three days ago is still something she’s expecting them to keep.
Featured on Happy from Home:
