She Told Her Boss That She Had A Terrible Experience Last Time She Had To Stay With A Coworker For A Work Trip Yet Her Boss Is Making Her Room With The Same Person Again

She has a work trip coming up next month, three nights sponsoring an event with her boss and a coworker, and the room arrangement is the same as it always is. Her boss gets her own room. The two employees share. When she mentions this setup to people outside of work, they’re consistently surprised by it, and several have told her they’d never expect to share a hotel room with a coworker on a business trip. She’s starting to wonder whether her company is genuinely out of step with how most employers handle travel or whether she’s been assuming something unusual is normal because it’s all she’s known at this job.

The question isn’t purely abstract for her either, because she already knows from experience what sharing a room with this particular coworker looks like. The last time they traveled together, the coworker spent significant stretches of time walking around completely naked, had long speakerphone conversations with her significant other that went on for hours, and had a difficult attitude throughout the trip. She told her bosses afterward that sharing a room hadn’t been a good experience, though she left out some of the more specific details. When she recently asked her boss whether separate rooms might be possible for the upcoming trip, her boss laughed and said no.

Whether shared hotel rooms on work trips are actually normal

Requiring employees to share hotel rooms is not standard practice at most companies, and the reaction she gets when she describes the arrangement to people outside her workplace reflects that accurately. The general expectation in professional environments is that each employee traveling on company business gets their own room, both because it’s a basic condition of dignity during work travel and because shared sleeping spaces between coworkers create privacy, comfort, and boundary issues that most employers prefer to avoid entirely.

There are contexts where shared accommodations make sense, team camping trips, certain training programs, travel budgets that are genuinely constrained to the point where the alternative is not traveling at all, but a standard work trip where the boss is already getting her own room isn’t one of them. The arrangement she’s describing, where the hierarchy determines who gets privacy and who doesn’t, isn’t a cost-saving measure applied evenly. It’s a benefit the boss has reserved for herself while the people who work for her absorb the discomfort of sharing.

Why the boss having her own room changes the conversation

If the company’s position were that nobody gets a private room because the budget doesn’t allow it, that would at least be a consistent policy applied to everyone traveling. What’s actually happening is that one person’s privacy and comfort is being treated as a given while two other people are expected to share a sleeping space for three nights. That distinction matters because it means the decision isn’t about budget constraints. It’s about who in the hierarchy gets to be comfortable on work travel and who doesn’t.

Her boss laughing when she asked about separate rooms suggests she either doesn’t take the request seriously or doesn’t see the arrangement as something worth reconsidering. Neither of those responses accounts for the fact that the last trip with this coworker was uncomfortable enough that she felt the need to report it afterward, even in a softened version.

What the specific coworker situation adds to this

The general question of whether shared hotel rooms are normal is separate from the specific problem of being expected to share a room with someone whose behavior during the last trip was genuinely disruptive. Walking around naked in a shared hotel room with a coworker, holding hours-long speakerphone conversations with a partner, and bringing a difficult attitude to a work trip aren’t minor quirks to adjust around. They’re behaviors that made a work obligation actively unpleasant and that she flagged to her employer, however gently.

Her employer’s response to that feedback was essentially to schedule the same arrangement again without any acknowledgment that the previous experience had been a problem. That’s a different issue from whether shared rooms are industry standard. It’s a question of whether her employer takes her comfort and her work experience seriously enough to respond when she raises a legitimate concern.

What her options actually look like

She doesn’t have an HR department to escalate to, and her boss has already declined the request for separate rooms directly. That narrows the practical options but doesn’t eliminate them. One approach is to book her own room independently and ask to be reimbursed, framing it as a reasonable accommodation given the documented issues with the previous shared arrangement. Her employer might say no to reimbursement, but it puts the decision about her own comfort back in her hands rather than leaving it entirely up to a boss who laughed at the question.

She can also be more specific with her boss about what happened during the last trip, since she deliberately softened the details when she reported it before. Her boss may have a different response to hearing that the coworker spent hours naked in the shared room and on speakerphone with her partner than she did to a vague report that things hadn’t gone well. It’s not a guaranteed outcome, but giving her employer the full picture before the trip is a reasonable step before deciding how to handle the situation if nothing changes.

Featured on Happy from Home: